Comments on: SciCal http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/ Me and my apps. Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:21:04 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: soemyintlulu http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-45 soemyintlulu Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:21:04 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-45 its a very good calculator, i wish we can add custom constant conversions or custom functions in it on future, thanks its a very good calculator, i wish we can add custom constant conversions or custom functions in it on future, thanks

]]> By: GS http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-44 GS Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:57:19 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-44 First, this is a great start. I have been looking for this kind of calculator for a long time. I agree, the factorial function is not working correctly. 19!=121645100408832000, but SciCal gives 109641728. Also, can you make this one more like TI-85 calculator with built-in constant? Also, when use the function or Const, once a fuction is selected, the screen should go back to Main to type in the number. Can you redesignt he icon. It looks really bad. First, this is a great start. I have been looking for this kind of calculator for a long time.
I agree, the factorial function is not working correctly.
19!=121645100408832000, but SciCal gives 109641728.
Also, can you make this one more like TI-85 calculator with built-in constant? Also, when use the function or Const, once a fuction is selected, the screen should go back to Main to type in the number.
Can you redesignt he icon. It looks really bad.

]]> By: Greg Winig http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-39 Greg Winig Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:13:04 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-39 I FOUND AN ERROR. 26 FACTORIAL COMES OUT WAY WRONG! I FOUND AN ERROR. 26 FACTORIAL COMES OUT WAY WRONG!

]]> By: Quan http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-38 Quan Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:28:13 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-38 The pro version give u more function to use and an equation solver to solve equations. The pro version give u more function to use and an equation solver to solve equations.

]]> By: Greg Winig http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-37 Greg Winig Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:02:27 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-37 What is the difference between the pro and lite versions of sci cal? What is the difference between the pro and lite versions of sci cal?

]]> By: Don Dunfee http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-36 Don Dunfee Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:43:40 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-36 Factorial function needs to be checked. Try a large number factorial, then multiply by the next number, then the next number, using just the multiplication key. Results are reasonable. Start with 16!, then multiply the result by 17, etc. Get to 19! Now try the function. Result is off. Factorial function needs to be checked.
Try a large number factorial, then multiply by
the next number, then the next number, using just
the multiplication key. Results are reasonable.
Start with 16!, then multiply the result by 17, etc.
Get to 19! Now try the function. Result is off.

]]> By: IPHONEWATCHERS.COM » Blog Archive » SciCal Lite - Scientific Calculator http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-32 IPHONEWATCHERS.COM » Blog Archive » SciCal Lite - Scientific Calculator Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:37:27 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-32 [...] ez.scical@gmail.com Updated:Fixed a bug occurred when the expression is too long. Website: http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/ Support Website: [...] [...] ez.scical@gmail.com Updated:Fixed a bug occurred when the expression is too long. Website: http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/ Support Website: [...]

]]> By: meeble http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-27 meeble Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:00:00 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-27 sweet, the latest version fixed a bug i guess SciCal was having with parenthesis! sweet, the latest version fixed a bug i guess SciCal was having with parenthesis!

]]> By: Alexwebmaster http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-26 Alexwebmaster Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:41:17 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-26 Hello webmaster I would like to share with you a link to your site write me here preonrelt@mail.ru Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

]]> By: quanlam http://quanlam.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/scical/#comment-25 quanlam Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:41:12 +0000 http://quanlam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-25 (1 + AER)^1/m-1 by convention will be understand as ((1+ AER)^1)/m and the result will be different to (1 + AER)^(1/m) About ((1-(1+0.05)^-5)/0.05)*100 I will try to find the problem. Thank you for your feedback. (1 + AER)^1/m-1 by convention will be understand as ((1+ AER)^1)/m
and the result will be different to (1 + AER)^(1/m)

About ((1-(1+0.05)^-5)/0.05)*100 I will try to find the problem.

Thank you for your feedback.

]]>